Film review: Never Grow Old (2019)

Film review
Never Grow Old (2019)
By Roger Crow/@RogerCrow
Starring Emile Hirsch, John Cusack, Deborah Francois
Directed by Ivan Kavanagh
Certificate 15
From its catchy opening music and initial picture postcard views of the old west, this atmospheric drama sets out its rather predictable stall early. 
There’s the fire and brimstone preacher; the community of impoverished good hearted folk, and the Irish family with, inevitably when it comes to films like this, another on the way. So far so predictable. Even a trip to the local shop is interrupted by a rather rude stranger who wastes little time making his presence felt with a sudden demand for tobacco.
Just to emphasise how desperate our wholesome family is, their horse falls sick and dad is forced to put him out of his misery. That scene drags on far longer than needed. 
As John Cusack’s Dutch Albert and his rogue’s gallery of outlaws arrives on the scene, the hero, an undertaker called Patrick Tate, finds his plight goes from bad to worse.
When Tate has to welcome the bad guys into his home in the middle of the night, you know this is not going to end well for him or his wife.
Though it’s not quite the imminent assault one might expect, sunshine is in short supply here. 

The whole thing looks wonderful, the attention to detail is impressive, and the photography by cinematographer Piers McGrail is gorgeous. 
And while the script by director Ivan Kavanagh could have done with a little work, this Irish production starts off well. 
The cast are very good, from showbiz veteran Christopher Fairbank (Batman/Guardians of the Galaxy) to Emile Hirsch, seen most recently in Tarantino’s masterpiece Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood. 
John Cusack seems to be modelling himself on Bill Hicks, but he’s always good value for money in an unsympathetic role. 
Alas, it soon turns miserable, then gets even more depressing. 
A beautifully crafted, mud-flecked way to dampen anyone’s spirits. 
It’s a while since I’ve wanted a movie to finish early, but this is a pretty draining experience which will test the good will of most. 
Imagine 100 minutes of trudging through a mud soaked field in socks during winter and you have a feeling of what to expect. 
In short: less Unforgiven. More Unforgivable. 
Script. 7
Photography. 9
Music. 8. 
Cast 8. 
Feel good Factor. 1. 
Direction. 7 

An Interview with Gerald Scarfe

An Interview with Gerald Scarfe

By Roger Crow/@RogerCrow

Ahead of his appearance at the Ilkley Literary Festival (4-20 October), legendary caricaturist Gerald Scarfe CBE talks about art, asthma, and his autobiography, Long Drawn Out Trip.

I’m loving your book.

Thank you.

Was there anything you learned from writing Long Drawn Out Trip that you didn’t from making documentaries for example?

A lot. When I was first asked to write it by my publisher, I thought, ’Oh I’m not sure if I want to do this’. Then after thinking about it, I thought I better give it a crack. I cobbled together some bits and pieces I’d written already to give myself a sort of a footprint to start with, you know, the foundations. And then it began to sort of interest me, because I don’t really know anything about myself, and they told me, the publishers, that what people would want to know is what formed this so-called ‘grotesque, ferocious’ (laughs) and all these adjectives that they attach to me… ‘satirical, bitter artist’, you know, and what was it that started all this?

And of course I thought about it myself, why I have such a black view of life. And I’ve always answered that it’s because of my asthmatic childhood and it was war time.

A lot of other people had similar beginnings, but haven’t actually turned out to be bitter or black-viewed artists.

We all have childhood memories and they’re usually sort of extreme things that float to the top; things when you were hurt or something dramatic happened. The quieter, normal day-to-day things don’t stay in the memory. So I started with those and I realised that I didn’t know much about my parents. When they were alive I never bothered to ask them. I wasn’t really interested I suppose to be honest. But I began to delve. It’s a bit like one of those editions of Who Do You Think You Are? You start almost like a detective tracing your own trail.

Asthma aside, it’s a blessed life really, when you think about working with Pink Floyd, the Beatles and creating all those incredible art and sculptures.

Well it was, but luckily it was the only thing I could do. Because as you read, I’m uneducated really; my schooling was negative.

You’ve always come across as very well educated.

Oh thank you, but you can see (in the book) that I didn’t really go to school very much. Until I was a little older, like 15 or 16. But even then I was still suffering with the bloody thing. Even though I still have asthma and I take a twice-daily dose of something to keep it level.

Is art is a good therapy for your asthma?

Very much so, yeah. That’s a good question. I remember once saying on the Johnny Carson show in America, “If I’m not working I feel constipated”.

They said, “Ahh, that’s a no no,”. They didn’t use the word constipated on television in the 60s or 70s. (Laughs). It is a bit like that, I feel kind of bottled up. And it is a great release; a great therapy really.

It is for everyone. At the moment I am patron of something called Campaign for Drawing. It encourages people of whatever age to draw. We all have the ability to draw when we’re children. But after a while people give it up. They think ’I can’t draw. I can’t do perspective. I can’t do shading. I can’t get a likeness. And my friends are laughing at my drawings’. It’s a shame. Everybody has the ability to draw, but this campaign I’m patron of encourages people of whatever age to take it up again. But as you say, it is therapeutic.

When the promo for Pink Floyd’s Another Brick in The Wall was released 40 years ago, it was a revelation. That must have created a bigger fan base.

Yeah, it’s extraordinary. I still get emails all the time. A guy sent me an email saying ‘Could he have my signature?’ I said ‘Why?’. He said, ‘Because I want to tattoo it on my arm. I’ve got all your drawings up and down my arm and all over my chest’. And I said ‘Sure, you disfigure your body if you want to’. Anyway, when he was having the tattoo put on, he sent me a video of that happening, and he told me how the drawings in The Wall had got him through the Gulf War. And he sent me his Gulf War medal. I sent it back by the way. I said ‘You’re the hero. Not me.’ It just shows the impact that music and to a certain extent visuals can have on people‘s lives or minds.

Knowing how much you loved Disney as a kid, what was it like getting that call to work on Hercules?

Unbelievable! And also Disney don’t do that. They don’t have outside designers joining. It’s all done in house. They have a Disney style and a Disney attitude. So it’s only because the directors who knew me when they were growing up as students. They were kind enough to say that they were fans of my work at that time and I was asked to do it.

I started doing a few bits and pieces, and then it grew and grew and grew. Eventually I designed every character and many of the scenes. I would say it’s the nearest thing I’ll get to being Tom Cruise. They treated me extremely well there.

How far is too far in a piece of artwork?

Well I try not to think of that. When I’m working in my studio alone I just try to put down what I feel. Of course if you’re working for a daily newspaper you’ve got your own self censorship going on. But I try really to, as I did with the book, to write down or put down the image I have in my mind and not think ‘ Oh they’re never gonna print this,’ but I can’t pretend there isn’t some element of censorship. As there is with all journalists. You can’t eff and blind through every sentence. You’ve got to realise that the editor is going to take it all out anyway.

I suppose one of the better things about being an artist is that editors can’t intervene in that way. They can stop the drawing but they can’t edit it. They can’t say “Oh that nose is too big”, or redraw the nose for you. It’s pretty free really being a cartoonist.

If you could give your 18-year-old self one piece of advice, what would it be?

Well, don’t worry so much. I was such an anxious child. And I was an only child until the age of nine.Then my brother came along. I guess it was wartime, and with the asthma (Gerald coughs). Right on cue… People thought I was going to die.

As Roger (Waters) says in one of his lyrics, “Mamma’s gonna put all of her fears into you”. I think you pick up a lot from your parents, and naturally they were worried about their sickly child.

I would say now of course, here I am at this venerable age, I never thought I would get anywhere near it. And looking back, don’t worry about it, you know? Things go wrong. Some things go right luckily. Try and lighten up.

It’s okay saying that, but you can’t do it, especially when you’re an 18 year old, who’s extremely anxious about everything. Enjoy life in other words. It’s an amazing place we are all in. And if one can only see it. When you start to think at the end of your life about losing it all, you realise how amazing it is.

Ends

Film review: Scarborough 

Film review 
Scarborough 
By Roger Crow/@RogerCrow
Starring Jodhi May, Jessica Barden, Jordan Bolger, Edward Hogg
Director Barnaby Southcombe
Certificate 15
There’s such a clever interconnecting story in new film Scarborough, that I bet whoever wrote the synopsis had a nightmare trying to sum up the tale without giving too much away. 
It goes something like this: two mismatched lovers arrive in the eponymous seaside town. Liz, shy and beautiful, is older than her companion, the impulsive, happy-go-lucky Daz. In their faded hotel room, and away from the prying eyes of their hometown, they laugh, quarrel and enjoy their anonymity.
In an identical room in the same hotel, the artist Aiden and Beth, a fiery and impulsive young woman, tell the same story. 
(There are times when the dialogue is identical, which makes you wonder why. Like classic Doctor Who episode Midnight, it’s a compelling gimmick). 
As both couples come to terms with the nature of their impossible romance, power shifts from one lover to the other, and joy turns to heartache as they reel from the destructive force of illicit love.

It’s only when adapting that synopsis that I realise how clever the script is. 
And despite the fact 1992’s Last of the Mohicans is one of my favourite films, I didn’t recognise the hugely talented Jodhi May as Liz. 
Peaky Blinders fans will spot Jordan Bolger, while Edward Hogg (who popped up In the sublime Adult Life Skills, and Tom Hardy’s Taboo) is also very good in a controversial role. 
However, once more it’s Jessica Barden (The End of the F***king World) who proves she’s one of the brightest stars in British film and TV. 
She first dropped onto my radar in Corrie years ago, before a shining turn in Tamara Drewe and rather good 2017 horror Habit. Here she gives a fearless performance as the protagonist who leaps from overjoyed to petulant in the blink of an eye. Some actors sound like they’re reading lines from a memorised script. She has a magnetic naturalism that means she dominates every scene she’s in. A very clever piece of casting that will leave viewers both disturbed and concerned. 
Again this is one of those reviews that tells you very little, but deliberately so. 
Adapted from the acclaimed play by Fiona Evans, writer/director Barnaby Southcombe does a terrific job of sustaining the attention throughout. 
It deserves to be seen on the big screen as mobile phones, like those in the film, have a habit of wrecking the mood. The fact I didn’t look at mine once during the screener tells you how good this is. 
Though the twist slowly revealed itself towards the end, it’s so brilliantly edited by Agnieszka Liggett that many will be hooked until the closing scenes.  
I may have to watch it again to see how cleverly this was assembled. 
On a side note, the fact it premieres on the same day as Derren Litten’s namesake BBC sitcom is one of those weird coincidences that may leave Scarborough council bracing themselves for a sudden influx of tourism. 
Ends

TV review – Carnival Row

TV review – Carnival Row

It takes a while to get into ambitious new fantasy epic Carnival Row, episode one at least.

The set-up is simple enough: creatures flee their war-torn homeland and gather in the city (the Burgue) as tensions simmer between citizens and the growing immigrant population.

In short: it’s an Upstairs Downstairs meets Ripper Street meets Game of Thrones sweary effects fest from one of the blokes who brought you Pacific Rim (*Travis Beacham) and René Echevarria (Star Trek: The Next Generation/The 4400).

*Beacham penned a film script called A Killing on Carnival Row, but it was obviously expanded for binge-worthy purposes.

Orlando Bloom is surprisingly good as Rycroft Philostrate, the gruff copper with a shady past who has a history with Cara Delevigne’s heroine, Vignette Stonemoss.

Those floppy wings are a little odd, until of course she takes flight, and then you wonder why she ran through the forest in the opening shot when she could have flown. But of course fantasy epics are littered with such questions. And it would have spoiled the reveal when she lands on a ship.

Jared Harris gives a scenery-chewing performance as Absalom Breakspear, Chancellor of the Republic of the Burgue; Indira Varma (Torchwood/This Way Up) is as watchable as ever, here playing Piety Breakspear, Absalom’s wife, and solid support comes from Simon McBurney as Runyan Millworthy, a street performer and master of a troupe of ’kobolds’, aka tiny actors even smaller than Simon’s Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation colleague Tom Cruise.

Maeve Dermody also gives a good turn as Portia Fyfe, Philo’s alluring landlady, who offers more than just bed and breakfast, but is prone to the odd cliche such as “Why won’t you let anyone love you?” or words to that effect.

The Czech sets give the world that essential lived-in quality. And once you get over that all important world-building opener, it ticks over a treat.

There’s stuff you’ve never seen before in a mainstream drama, and the cast play it just right. There’s no sly winks to camera, which is crucial if this is going to fill the gap left by Game of Thrones.

Harry Potter veteran Nick Dudman’s make-up and prosthetics are superb.

Naturally there are forces of darkness at play. A bad guy is killing or attacking pixie prostitutes, and Inspector Philostrate of the yard is called into investigate.

There’s a rooftop chase, which feels like it’s been plucked from fun steampunk video game Dishonoured.

Meanwhile, pixie Vignette learns how to be a housemaid, but etiquette is not her strong point. And there’s plenty of racism subtexts as Imogen Spurnrose, the privileged lady of the house where Cara works, is repelled by her literally horny new neighbour, Agreus Astrayon.

She’s one step away from waving a fan and yelling “How dare you sir”, while flashing an ankle and walking off in disgust.

The long flashback in episode three fills in a lot of background to the first two eps, and is arguably the best. Some great performances, effects and set pieces help make it unmissable.

Will pixie kids be torn away from their parents as the corrupt government sets up labour camps, or will the showrunners steer clear of the real world for inspiration?

That remains to be seen, but three episodes in I’m keen to see what happens next. And that’s got to be a good sign.

Five characters to remember:

Orlando is war veteran Rycroft Philostrate, an Inspector of the Burgue Constabulary.

Cara is Vignette Stonemoss, a fae (fairy/pixie) and Philo’s lover. They have a past. It’s complicated.

David Gyasi is Agreus Astrayon, a rich Puck shunned by Burgue high society for his appearance.

Tamzin Merchant is Imogen Spurnrose, an heiress who becomes involved with Agreus to support her lifestyle.

Andrew Gower is Ezra Spurnrose, Imogen’s repressed brother who spent the family fortune.

There’s eight episodes, and a second run is already in the offing so its future looks secure for a while.

:: Carnival Row is streaming on Amazon Prime now.

Film review – Aquaman

Aquaman 
Starring Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Willem Dafoe 
Directed by James Wan
Certificate 12
I have seen some crazy comic book movies in my time, but nothing prepared me for the sheer lunacy of this much hyped blockbuster. 
I’m guessing the budget for Aquaman was between $150m and $200m. Of that sum about $50 was spent on the script, $50m on the cast, and the rest on an army of effects wizards. 
The story involves a princess of Atlantis (Nicole Kidman) who washes up at a lighthouse keeper’s craggy rock; they fall in love (despite zero chemistry), have a son called Arthur, then she returns to the briny depths. 
What follows is one of the most barking fantasy adventures you’ll ever see in which bad guy Patrick Wilson tries to become new king of a watery empire and his terror troops (who all look like action figures) run around blasting everything that moves. 
This is a world where an octopus plays the drums. It’s a place which looks like Tron and Finding Nemo, and people talk underwater without bubbles emanating from their mouths. 
In one scene a bad guy arrives by jet pack and looks like he’s wearing a joke alien costume. Like an action figure where the head has been removed and an oversized one from another figure has been slotted in its place. 
While grown up Arthur Curry fends off bad guys and struggles with his destiny, he also has to find a magic trident. 
(There are flashbacks of young Arthur training with Willem, and the poor lad playing Curry looks like he trained at the Hayden Christensen school of acting. Truly dreadful). 
After 90 minutes, I was desperate for the end and took a break. So glad I did because then things ramp up to headache-inducing levels of visual madness as good vs evil. 
Threading all of this together is Jason Momoa as the eponymous hero. 
He was great in Game of Thrones, pretty good in Conan, but here he’s really found his niche as the charismatic hero who plays the whole thing with the right amount of tongue in cheek. 
Amber Heard is his alluring love interest, and Willem Dafoe at his earnest best as the obligatory mentor character usually played by Liam Neeson. 
Oh, and Dolph Lundgren also pops up for some reason. He’s totally miscast. 
Should we ever forget Zack Snyder had a hand in production, there are slo-mo battle scenes like 300, so it feels about 15 years out of date. Yet the whole thing is directed with such energy by James Wan, there’s never a chance to get bored. 
Years ago the series Entourage had an Aquaman movie as a running gag, with James Cameron supposedly directing. He’s a natural fit for the material, and given the fact Hollywood wants every movie to look like anything that made a serious amount of cash, there’s little wonder it looks like Avatar. 
I was exhausted by the end, and wonder if one day the folks at DC movies will ever crack the art of exposition (it has to be done on the move like Terminator, rather than two folks stood around talking). However, while it might be a retina-searing, logic-defying assault on the senses, and looks like the crew did most of their research by studying Finding Nemo rather than real fish, this is quite an experience. 
It’s easily one of the worst films of the past 12 months, but hard to get angry over. Like a kid who’s had too many E numbers, running around making gun sounds while pretending to be a plane, you hope it’ll get tired and go for a long nap, but given the billion-dollar haul, and the tagged on credits sting alluding to a sequel, I’m guessing that will be with us in a year or two. 
I hope the drum-playing octopus is back if nothing else. In fact he should have his own spin-off movie. That would make a lot more sense. 
Compared to this, the Spongebob Squarepants saga looks like a grittily realistic study of marine life. I’m just glad I didn’t shell out a fortune to see it at the cinema. 
3/10

Review: Critters Attack

Critters Attack
Starring Tashiana Washington, Ava Preston, Jack Fulton
Certificate 15
Directed by Bobby Miller

The latest chapter in a phenomenally rubbish Gremlins-inspired saga opens with a guy on a bike, some woods and high powered torch beams. You know, like ET. And Dee Wallace Stone was in the original Critters. It’s an in joke. Get it? No, probably not, because this seems aimed at 12 year olds who are perhaps too busy sharing screengrabs of their progress on Fortnite rather than wallowing in an eighties nostalgia fest. It so wants to tap into the cool synth pop vibe of Stranger Things, but most of the cast seem bored by Scott Lobdell’s script and the fact they’re overshadowed by angry, toothy alien fluff balls. 


Lobdell also penned Happy Death Day, which is a far superior meta horror comedy, so he must have had his mind on other things while knocking this script up. 
Dee is also back, briefly, though why is anyone’s guess. She’s a far better actress who should be doing more interesting things with her time, like watching paint dry. 
The plot follows 20-year-old Drea, who takes a job babysitting for a professor of a college she hopes to attend. 
Desperate to entertain the professor’s kids Trissy and Jake, as well as her own little brother Phillip, Drea takes them on a hike, unaware that savage alien beasts have crash-landed and started scoffing every living thing they encounter.
So far, so yawnsome. 

On the plus side, the picture quality is great, and while it might not be as cool as Stranger Things, undiscerning viewers might like it. However, I get the feeling those who grew up with the original will get more of a kick out of it than their kids. 
At a little under 90 minutes it’s mercifully short, but don’t be too surprised if you find yourself rooting for some of the least imaginative aliens ever committed to film. 
“I’m sorry you had to see that,” explains the female protagonist at one point when a ball of critters squashes a fleeing runner. 
I get the feeling she’s apologising to the audience as well as her co-star. 

Extra featurettes include Engineering Gore; Designing Critters; Critters: An Out-of-this-World Experience; The Critter Ball, and scene specific commentary with director Bobby Miller and a Critter. 
Truly awful. 

3/10

Film review: Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood 

Film review
Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood 
Director: Quentin Tarantino 
Starring: Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Margot Robbie
Certificate 18
By Roger Crow/@RogerCrow

When I heard that Quentin Tarantino was making a movie about Charles Manson and Sharon Tate, my heart sank a little. Love or hate him, there’s no denying QT is a genius film maker. Yes, there are times when his scripts need trimming or he’s excessively violent, but when he’s on good form, as in pretty much every film barring Death Proof, he’s excellent. 
But the Manson-Tate saga. Did we really need another movie examining the darkest time in Hollywood history?
It turns out we really did, when filtered through Quentin’s lens. 
The joy of the movie, and it is a joy, is focusing on Rick Dalton (Leonardo diCaprio), a TV star with dreams of movie stardom who is at a crossroads in his career. 
If he keeps doing what he’s doing, he’ll be a washed up has been in a few months. Or he can make a Western that he deems beneath him. Tackling his demons of self doubt gives us some funny scenes, but also a chance to see what he’s great at. The hidden depths if you like. 
His brother in all but name is his double and stuntman Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt). “More than a buddy, less than a wife,” as he’s described. 
He’s also more of a driver, handyman and gofer these days. As we discover, Cliff has a shady past, that may or may not be true, and when he gets a shot at working on Rick’s new film, a run-in with Bruce Lee has repercussions. 
While these two are doing their thing, glowing actress and neighbour Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie) is partying with partner Roman Polanski, and soaking up life in Tinseltown. And in their peripheral vision is the shadow of what’s to come. 
Margaret Qualley gives a good turn as a creepy Manson girl, while Julia Butters, like Natalie Portman and Chloe Grace Moretz before her, will no doubt be snapped up for countless roles after her turn as a wise-beyond-her years child actor. 
It’s interesting that this is the first QT movie made post-Harvey Weinstein, and inevitably reviewers will jump on how it affects Tarantino in a #metoo world. (Harry Potter/Gravity’s David Heyman is now one of the backers, so the movie’s very much in safe hands). 
I could mention more of the plot, which is sketchy at best. It’s more of a long build up to that finale, which I was dreading from minute one. The glory of this is how it fleshes out the lives of Rick and Cliff, the Rosencratz and Guildenstern of the Tate story if you like. Quentin has always been best at shining a light on peripheral characters rather than have leads carry a movie. His pending version of Star Trek will probably view everything from a doomed red shirt’s perspective rather than Kirk’s, if it ever sees the light of day. But for now, he’s given the world a glorious love letter to Hollywood, from its crackling neon signs, and film posters to the movies themselves. And these aren’t the biggest films of 50 years ago, but cult offerings like Tate’s The Wrecking Crew. The bread and butter movies which kept Hollywood ticking over. 
By that finale my absolute dread thankfully melted away. It’s a while since I’ve been that tense in any film, (a scene with Pitt on a ranch ramps up the tension), though it either helps or hinders your experience depending on how much you knew about the horrors of that era. 
The fact I could have clapped at the end tells you hope much I enjoyed it. Okay, it’s not a perfect film, but it’s one I could happily watch again for those glorious scenes. 
As usual Tarantino’s characters get under your skin, and Dalton and Booth are fine additions to his catalogue of creations such as Pulp Fiction’s Vincent Vega and Hateful 8’s Daisy Domergue. 
Some may come out wondering what just happened, while others will have that same cathartic release I did. 
Either way, it’s a glorious experience which film lovers will adore, and that title is spot on, for reasons I won’t go into. 
Yes, a deliberately vague review, but if you get a chance, see this at a decent cinema. 
We drove 70 miles to see it at one of Blighty’s best indie movie houses, Kinema in the Woods (complete with intermission), and it was all the better for it. 
The fact I’d do it again tells you how good this is. 
9/10

Newton’s Law: The Man Who Fell to Earth

With a new TV version of The Man Who Fell to Earth planned, Nostalgiahhh takes a look back at Bowie’s 1976 classic.

Great sci-fi movies are like skyscraper lifts: they work on many different levels.

When The Man Who Fell to Earth was released in 1976, it was the Burj Khalifa elevator of films.

An adaptation of the Walter Tevis novel. A star vehicle for David Bowie. An art house movie. A racy popcorn flick. A sci-fi adventure. An allegory about alcoholism. The list goes on.

And while it could have been a direct adaptation of the Tevis novel, with a cinematic visionary like Nicolas Roeg in charge, it was so much more.

Though a pipe dream at the time, the Burj Khalifa Was just the sort of epic structure mysterious tycoon Thomas Jerome Newton would finance.

When I first saw the film on its UK TV premiere (BBC Two, Sunday, 20th December, 1981), it left an indelible mark on my 13-year-old brain.

The aptly weird and very literal black and white illustration of Bowie’s character falling in the Radio Times was a taste of things to come.

(Thanks to a friend on Twitter, I clap eyes on that cartoon for the first time since 1982).

So, having endured a repeat of laughably bad drama The Borgias, I stayed up until the early hours watching that retina-searing fantasy adventure.

This was back in the days when watching immediate repeats was almost unheard of. (It would be another six years before I had enough cash to rent a video player).

So I waited for a second viewing. Three years of waiting. The ability to watch almost whatever you like and when is a luxury I could only have dreamed of then.

I’ll admit that some of the hot-under-the-collar scenes were one of the reasons for my desperation to watch again, but repeat visits underlined the fact that this was sci-fi like I’d never seen before.

Of course at that age, cinematic experiences were limited to A/PG movies, so staying up for something so intense was like cat nip.

It was mind-bending, perception-altering entertainment which featured a peerless performance from Bowie. He was apparently so immersed in the role, as with so many of his creations, the thin white duke stayed in character for some time after the cameras had finally finished rolling.

Given some of his addictions, there was a wonder Bowie was as focused as he is in The Man Who…

He was also incredibly precise. As a musician used to multiple performances, he’d repeat a scene several times in exactly the same way, such as a scene in which he stirs a drink with a gun (according to cinematographer Anthony Richmond in the DVD release).

Tevis’s novel was adapted by Paul Mayersberg, a writer who later worked on The Disappearance, a little-seen Donald Sutherland film; re-teamed with Bowie for Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence, and also with Roeg for cult oddity Eureka.

Years later he also scripted Croupier, the cult Mike Hodges film which looked like Clive Owen would be a shoo-in for 007. Alas, it was not to be.

Thomas Jerome Newton remains one of fantasy cinema’s most alien and yet human creations. A hairless, genital-free being whose mating rituals seem to involve an off-screen trampoline and gallons of milk.

Obviously it’s not intended to be milk, and it’s not rocket science to figure out what it is, though in an age where everything has been done in cinema, no one but Roeg has achieved something so audacious.

It was also one big gag. An alien comes to Earth in search of water and winds up desperate for his next drink as an alcoholic.

The movie was produced by Michael Deeley, one of the most important film makers of the past 50 years. After all, without him there would have been no Italian Job, no Deer Hunter and no Blade Runner.

I interviewed Michael in 2008 for a car Q and A while he was publicising his book Blade Runners, Deer Hunters and Blowing the Bloody Doors Off.

While some producers can be egocentric, he was the model gent. Polite, hugely co-operative and thrilled to discuss his beloved movies The Italian Job, Blade Runner and you know what.

We chatted about TMWFTE’s production and the fact his company saved a fortune by flying an Aer Lingus plane, together with all the crew and equipment from London, via Shannon in Ireland (where it refuelled) to Albuquerque.

“This was the first time – and will probably stand as the last time – that a full-sized British crew shot an entire feature film in America”, he remarked in his book.

Roeg was a maverick who might use the script as a blueprint for his movies, but was just as keen to see what magic happens on the day. It might have wound up some of his crew who thought he didn’t know what he wanted, but golden era Roeg (1970 – 1976) proved he was a master of his craft. With hits such as Performance (co-directed by Donald Cammell); Walkabout and Don’t Look Now under his belt, it was clear that the ends justified the means.

Bowie’s wife Angie joined him on location with their four-year-old son Zowie.

Given his formative years and a dad who remains light years ahead of other visionary artists, there was little wonder Zowie, aka Duncan Jones, would go on to helm genre favourites such as Moon and Source Code. (The less said about flawed fantasies Warcraft and Mute the better).

Bowie might have been a genius, but he was also a bit of a diva. He had every right to be given his standing in the media. But whether he actually believed someone was trying to spike his beloved skimmed milk, or whether his dressing room was genuinely built on an unmarked Indian burial ground was anyone’s guess.

Obviously some people are more attuned to bad vibes than others, and given Bowie’s skills as an artist, chances are he was on the money even if the local OS map didn’t flag up such things.

Regardless, the crew had to cater to his every whim.

Candy Clark, who had risen to fame in George Lucas’s crowd-pleaser American Graffiti in 1973, gave a knockout turn as Mary-Lou, the hotel maid who becomes Newton’s lover.

Her genuine reaction to his alien appearance is still pretty raw to this day.

She had been dating Roeg and was the first person cast, having around six months to absorb the script.

However, when the film was released in a hacked up version for the US market, making it a two-hour cut, Candy was so upset by the truncated version, she dropped out of the promotional tour. A while later she was instrumental in ensuring the origin version was restored for US theatres.

Filming one of the final scheduled scenes, the splashdown of Newton’s craft in a mountain lake, was no walk in the park. Located 11,000 feet above sea level, the crew had to travel with oxygen tanks in each car to cope with the altitude. It didn’t hurt when producer and director found a bar which opened at 6am. Tequila sunrises helped them through the production a treat.

Years before his rib-tickling turn as producer Arthur in The Larry Sanders Show, the wonderfully monikered Rip Torn gave a powerhouse turn as Nathan Bryce, a randy lecturer who beds his students.

He plays an integral role in Newton’s plan to amass enough cash to help his ailing family, and planet.

It also starred Buck Henry, the actor and writer who gave the world Get Smart and The Graduate.

His excellent turn as Oliver Farnsworth offers an everyman reaction to Newton’s elaborate plan.

James Mason was originally wanted for Farnsworth’s character, and James Coburn for Nathan Bryce. Alas, the budget was so tight they couldn’t afford either so Henry and Torn were hired.

Mayersberg decided to play to Henry’s strengths, peppering his dialogue with gags.

For little indie studio British Lion, financing a movie like The Man Who… involved getting a major studio on board and then borrowing the rest of the cash against their investment.

Which is fine – until the new big cheese takes a look at what Paramount is buying and gets cold feet.

Barry Diller, the boss at ’the mountain’, was far from happy after watching a private screening in New York with Deeley.

Roeg’s non-linear style was far from the ABC TV films-style of films Diller was used to. (Both ABC as a company and in terms of 1,2,3 structure). This was more AZB or 2,3,1.

The Man… might have been filmed in America and featured a largely American cast, but this was about as European and art house as films got in the mid-1970s.

When Paramount falls out of love with a picture and with talks of law suits being bandied about, it wasn’t long before the film attracted a product on a par with biohazardous material.

Except it was anything but. However, Hollywood being one of the safest commercial entertainment factories on Earth, studio bosses at the time wanted a hit on a par with The Sting, The Godfather movies, and Jaws.

Even movies pitched as a mix of all three stood a better chance of getting studio cash, as nonsensical as they may have been.

Deeley eventually got the backing via a company called Studio 5, and the film was released.

It divided some critics, wowed others and left a major impression on the minds of film-makers such as Sam Taylor Wood (50 Shades of Gray) and Jonathan Glazer. (His own sci-fi masterpiece Under the Skin is just as mesmerising and disturbing as Roeg’s movie, and arguably the best film of its type since Bowie’s film debut).

In 1987, Hollywood decided to have another stab at the story, only this time as a linear, safe-as-houses USTV movie which, at the time, were about as daring as a stuntman who never left the house.

Despite an impressive cast, including Star Trek veterans Wil Wheaton and Robert Picardo, and Ghostbusters/Young Sheldon star Annie Potts, the TV film vanished with the skill of a stealth fighter behind enemy lines.

That, it seemed, was that.

However, in a project aptly called Lazarus, The Man… was re-launched as a stage show with Dexter’s Michael C Hall as Newton.

That musical was one of the last projects Bowie worked on before his death in January 2016, and along with key track Lazarus, is a heartfelt goodbye to his countless fans.

Forty three years after its release, The Man… remains an extraordinary piece of work. Especially the soundtrack, which was finally released a few years ago (after decades of being promised on the back of the tie-in paperback).

Though Bowie had been working on music for the film, it never quite happened, so John Phillips (The Mamas and the Papas) set to work recording in January 1976. He reworked his track Devil’s on the Loose for Bryce’s introductory theme – a glorious duel of vocoder and sax that eclipsed the original tune.

By March the film was in theatres.

Strangely he was listed as Musical Director, instead of composer, but his slices of musical Americana help the project enormously.

Years before Christopher Nolan started playing around with timelines for films such as Inception and Dunkirk, Roeg’s films played with the chronology of scenes. The beauty of The Man… is a movie that is both the past and future. It even predicted disposable cameras and TV screens that can be rolled up.

Thankfully, unlike those cameras, David Bowie’s feature debut is anything but disposable.

I have a much-repeated theory that any movie you see between the ages of 11 and 16 stays with you for life, like footprints in the wet cement of your mind.

For any outsider who travels to the States, we are all aliens, bombarded by its culture and history like Newton. And clearly the reverse is also true. I can only imagine what my American friends make of our culture in Blighty, but it’s that bridge between the two cultures that makes for endlessly fascinating conversations.

In the end we are all aliens, except these days watching the world via our phones and tablets instead of a bank of TVs (a scene which apparently influenced Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ classic saga Watchmen in 1985).

With another TV version planned, who knows whether Thomas’s enduring character survives on the small screen. Alex Kurtzman (Star Trek) is usually a safe pair of hands, so as writer, co-showrunner and director, let’s hope he has what it takes to give Newton a new lease of life.

Roger Crow

A Quick Chat with Vicki Michelle

Roger Crow talks to actress and showbiz legend Vicki Michelle about working on a trio of cult crackers. And he doesn’t get the urge to say “Ohhh Rennee!” once.

What are your memories of making Space: 1999?

“I remember it was such a popular series… Martin Landau and all those famous people. I was so privileged and excited to be doing it. It was only a small role; I think I was really quite young at that time. But what an iconic series it turned out to be, and I still love it now.”

Was The Professionals fun to work on as well?

“It was such fun. I think we were on location somewhere and the two boys (Martin Shaw and Lewis Collins) got out the car, and all these lads came up to them and said: “It’s the ’Fessionals!” The boys were lovely to work with. We’d be on the bus and having lunch, chatting to them. And at that time Martin Shaw was a vegetarian, which he still is, and that was quite unusual at that time. Great actors.

“I played his girlfriend in one, and I did another one with John Junkin; he was a great bloke. I remember that scene where I was filing my nails, and by the end of the scene I had no nails left,” she laughs.

I have to mention Allo Allo. What was it like to work on that?

“I was very proud to have been in such a fantastic comedy that is still bought all over the world today. I think Jeremy Lloyd told me we sold to over 80 countries.

“When you go abroad you forget, and you’re recognise abroad! We are so multicultural now that I get recognised all the time by people who are working here from other countries. So it’s still well loved and laugh out loud comedy. Brilliant writers.”

Could Allo Allo be made now, or did TV become too sensitive?

“I think we’ve become a little bit too politically correct, because we’re just killing humour now. The thing is we are now so politically correct that everyone is too frightened to say anything. So we have gone a bit too far with political correctness. Of course it’s important in some aspects.

“Would Allo Allo survive today? Yes, I suppose it would. It would have to be a bit more careful with some of the gags, but the guys were funny. When we first started to do it, we did have that, ’You’re sending up the war. And the people in the war’, and David Croft said, ’No, no, we sent up everyone’. And he describes how he and Jeremy Lloyd wrote: ’The Germans were kinky. The French are randy. And the British are stupid’. And I think that’s getting political correctness right. It’s like something for everyone.”

* Vicki can be seen in panto at Grand Opera House York, Fri 13 Dec, 2019 – Sat 4 Jan, 2020